09 February 2011

Should Victoria Beckham pose nude for US Vogue?

In the latest instalment of Beckham’s bump watch, we’ve heard (from Perez Hilton so it must be true?!) that VB is considering ‘doing a Demi’ and posing naked on the cover of US Vogue. Yes, our chins hit the floor as well, but according to Perez’s insider source – who later admits ‘nothing has been signed yet’ - Anna Wintour is backing the idea.

‘Knowing Victoria, she'll do something completely unique with it. It's not a very Vogue thing to do, but the team can make it work and make it 'fashion'. Anna's apparently really keen on it. Everyone's expecting it to fly off the shelves. Victoria's a huge style icon. Victoria would want to be sure she's the sexiest pregnant woman to ever grace a magazine cover. It will be a huge boost to her career from a fashion point of view.’

We know it’s the cover of the fashion bible, but is a nude pregnancy shoot really a strategic career boost? Christina Aguilera and Claudia Schiffer have previously bared their bumps – but then so have a lot of D-list mothers: Gail Porter, Chantelle from Big Brother, we could go on but you probably wouldn’t recognise half of them.

VB, who’s previously said she looks ‘really awful naked’ put her body through a vigorous work out routine in the run up to ‘that’ Armani shoot. So we can’t imagine she’d sign up to a nude pregnancy shoot lights… Unless her blooming body’s given her a new found confidence.

What do you think – should Victoria bare her bump for Vogue? Would it really be a career boost? You tell us…
 
- Amy Molloy


Comments

All posts must obey the house rules, if you object to any comments please let us know and we'll take the appropriate action.